These questions and answers are in addition to the frequently asked questions on this topic. They are archived questions and answers which were asked and answered on this website.
Please read the FAQs on this topic before going through these Q&As.
ABNORMAL PSA LEVEL/GLEASON GRADE: What is an abnormal PSA level and what are grade levels for prostate cancer?
Some doctors would say the PSA level is normal if it's below 4 ng/ml and above normal if it's above 4 ng/ml. I believe that the cutoff of 4 is too high and we have used 2.5 as our cut off in our PSA screening study since 1995. We have proven that if the PSA is between 2.5 and 4, there is a 22 percent chance that the man will have prostate cancer. We routinely recommend a biopsy if the PSA is above 2.5 and if the free PSA test confirms the advisability of performing a biopsy. Even men with PSA levels lower than 2.5 might have prostate cancer. In our studies, the median PSA level in men without known prostate cancer was less than 1 in men in their 40s and 50s and less than 1.5 in men over the age of 60. It the PSA level is higher than the median for the age group, the risk of prostate cancer is higher. So, if the PSA level is above the median and especially if it is rising, a biopsy should be considered.
Prostate cancers when looked at under the microscope can look like almost normal prostate tissue or they can look very wild and disorganized. They are graded on a scale called the Gleason grade of between 2 and 10 where 2 is the best, i.e., a low grade, slow growing prostate cancer, and a 10 would be the worst, i.e., a rapidly progressing, very aggressive prostate cancer. It turns out that grade level statistics for prostate cancer fall into a bell shaped curve. Only about 10 percent of tumors are grade 2, 3 and 4 and only about 10 percent of tumors are 8, 9 and 10 with the vast majority being Gleason grades 5, 6 and 7. Gleason grades 8-10 are considered highly aggressive, Gleason 7 is considered moderately highly aggressive (4+3 is considered to be more aggressive than 3+4), Gleason 3+3 is considered mildly aggressive, and Gleason 2-4 is considered so non-aggressive that immediate treatment might not be needed in men over the age of 70.
VIAGRA AND PSA RESULTS: Does taking Viagra the night before a PSA test affect the results? A week before?
It can if it results in sexual intercourse with ejaculation. Ejaculation elevates the PSA level for 24 to 48 hours.
STRESS AND PSA: Is there a known relation between personal stress and PSA results?
A: Not directly. Personal stress can cause sexual dysfunction or lower the body’s resistance to infection. That lowering might lead to prostatitis, and prostatitis can raise the PSA level temporarily.
EFFECT OF SEXUAL ACTIVITY ON PSA MEASUREMENT: Can frequent sex with a penile implant make a PSA level rise?
Sexual activity can cause a transient rise in the PSA level. This is usually a minimal rise and does not last for more than a 6 to 24 hours. Sex with or without a penile implant does not make a difference. It is ejaculation that causes the PSA to rise. It is ideal to avoid sex for 24 hours before PSA testing.
VARIATION OR ERROR IN PSA TEST: What is the error associated with the PSA exam? What sort of fluctuation in the PSA level would you expect if you ran a PSA test three different times on the same sample of blood?
If you ran the test on the same sample three times, the error should be no more that 3% or so. If you drew a blood sample on three successive days the variation may be as great as 10-15%.
HIGH PSA AND BIOPSIES DO NOT SHOW CANCER: My father, aged 54 years, has a PSA of 20. When he first had the test done at age 50,it was 17 and his doctor was reasonably very concerned. Since then, he has gone for a biopsy twice, and has had a total of 12 biopsies taken. All biopsies have come back negative for cancer. The doctors tell him his prostate is only slightly enlarged, and they cannot feel any tumors. He also says that they have found numerous "calcium crystals". Where he should be going from here? My dad really doesn't want to keep going for biopsies because they are very uncomfortable for him. Do you think annual biopsies are reasonable, or is there another test that may detect something the biopsy cannot?
Our studies show that prostatic biopsies can easily miss prostate cancers. In our recent analysis of more than 2500 men who underwent one or more prostate biopsies, of those who had cancer detected, only 77% had the cancer discovered on the first biopsy. Of the rest, 91% were discovered on the first or second biopsy, 97% on the first three biopsies, and 99% on the first 4 biopsies. Some men required 6 biopsy sessions to detect the cancer. So, with each biopsy session there is increased confidence that the high PSA might not be due to cancer. However, there is a current trend among urologists to obtain more biopsy cores during each biopsy session and to perform the biopsies under local or general anesthesia so that more biopsy samples can be obtained without undue discomfort. It is also important to ensure that the biopsies are directed to the zones of the prostate where most of the cancers are found. In some men the cancer may be located in the central region of the prostate gland where biopsies are not usually directed. Sometimes these cancers can be best detected on transurethral recection biopsies, obtained under anesthesia through a scope that is passed into the central part of the prostate gland. These biopsies are sometimes called “saturation biopsies.” Some men with high PSA values do not have prostate cancer. Other options are to try a long course of antibiotics such as Cipro 500 mg twice a day to see if it brings the PSA down. Other criteria to consider is the PSA density (PSA divided by prostate volume). If it is higher than 0.10, it is worrisome for prostate cancer. Also, measuring the percentage of free PSA (free PSA/total PSA x 100). If it is lower than 25%, it is of concern - and the lower, the more concerning. Certainly, annual biopsies are not unreasonable, especially if the PSA or other parameters continue to suggest a higher risk for prostate cancer.
RISING PSA: My PSA has is up to 6.9 from 1.2. I have known men with PSA of greater than 10. What treatment will my doctor recommend?
The PSA increase may be due to inflammation in the prostate. So, the first step is to take a 10 to 14 day course of antibiotics (such as Cipro 500 mg twice a day). Of course, if the PSA does not come back down, a biopsy of the prostate should be considered.
LOW PERCENTAGE OF FREE PSA: I am an active 59 year- old man with bladder cancer (diagnosed almost 3 years ago; stage 1, grade 3-4) which was surgically removed. I received BCG treatments for 18 months and have been watched and examined through cystoscopes, urine tests and blood tests. My PSA tests go between 4.0 and 4.5 and my free PSA tests had been a 6 and now is a 3. I have undergone 2 prostate biopsies with 10 samples taken each time. Cancer has not been found. My question is what could make my percentage of free PSA so low? My doctor has stated that my prostate is large. Are there any suggestions or do we just keep checking with biopsies?
When the total PSA is between 4 and 10 and the percentage of free PSA is less than 10, there is about a 58% chance that biopsies will show cancer. This means that there is a 42% chance that the biopsies will not show cancer. I would advise that you monitor the total PSA level and the free PSA level, and if the total PSA level rises, consider further biopsies. It is possible that with a large prostate gland, there could be areas of cancer that were missed by the first two sets of biopsies. If you want to be as pro-active as possible, you might want to consider repeating the biopsies again in one year. It is well established that BCG therapy for bladder cancer can induce chronic inflammation in the prostate gland that can result in a long-term elevation of the PSA level.
LOW FREE PSA PERCENTAGE: Besides cancer what else can cause a very low PSA free number?
There is still much to be learned about free PSA. We now know that there are several forms of it. One form is low in cancer and high with benign enlargement of the prostate. However, another form is high in cancer. In general, a low percentage of free PSA is worrisome for cancer – but not always. There are some men who have a low free PSA and do not have cancer. We don't know all of the explanations at this time.
RELATIVELY HIGH PSA BUT LOW CANCER VOLUME: My husband has PSA of 14.7, and Gleason score of 6, but in the biopsy that was done, cancer was found in only 1/200th of the sample tissue. What is likely to explain the high PSA, and yet seemingly small amount of cancer?
There are several possible explanations. Part of the high PSA could be due to benign prostatic enlargement or inflammation in the prostate. The cancer may be contributing a relatively small proportion of the PSA. Another possibility is that the biopsies may have failed to detect other regions of cancer within the prostate due to simple spatial sampling errors.
HIGH PSA IN OLDER MEN: On an 86 year old male is a PSA score of 10 considered high?
Yes. A PSA count of 10 is high at any age. It indicates that there is either benign enlargement of the prostate, inflammation in the prostate, prostate cancer - or a combination of the above. It would be prudent to be evaluated by a urologist.
OUTSIDE THINGS THAT AFFECT PSA LEVELS: In a normal, healthy man, would sexual intercourse the morning of the PSA test is performed raise the levels and possibly by how much if at all. Could a prostate exam prior to the PSA test elevate levels and by how much? Could an infection in a healthy man elevate PSA to 21?
The answer to all three quesitions is yes. Usually, ejaculation or a prostate exam has only a slight effect on the PSA level that lasts for 24 to48 hours only. The PSA might increase a point or two. With infection, very high PSA levels can occur (even up to 21 or higher) and in some cases it takes a long time for the PSA levels to return to baseline. In about 25% of cases, antibiotic therapy is effective; however, some men have to wait for their body’s defense mechanisms to clear the infection.
RAPIDLY RISING PSA IN PATIENT ON PROSCAR: My 88 yr old father has been on Proscar for 8 yrs now. Last year his PSA count was 4; last week his PSA was 11. The urologist did a digital exam and sonogram. The doctor concluded he had a "substantial" cancerous lesion. The doctor said he will have to do a biopsy to determine the type and stage and whether it is fast or slow growing. The doctor said if fast growing life expectancy can be up to 6 months and if slow growing he may die with it, not from it. I would like your comments in general on the above remarks and the items below.
1. If the doctor feels there are no viable treatments available to slow or prevent lesion spread, is the only reason for a biopsy to give us life expectancy?
2. Does the size of a lesion prohibit radiation, freezing or any other non- surgical remedies?
3. The fact that his PSA count increased from 4 to 11 count in one year, can a reasonable conclusion be made whether this is a fast or slow growing lesion?
3. Would you recommend a second opinion from an oncologist?
A rising PSA in a patient on Proscar is worrisome for prostate cancer. There are treatments to slow the progression of the cancer. The size limits some treatments, but not radiation or stronger hormonal therapy. If the PSA increase is due only to prostate cancer, it indicates a rapidly growing tumor; however, the increase could also be due, at least in part, to inflammation in the prostate (see other Q&A s on this topic). It never hurts to get another opinion from another urologist, medical oncologist or radiation oncologist.
Can cold or cough medication effect the PSA?
The only medicines that affect PSA levels are hormones. Medicines that lower male hormones can decrease PSA levels. The only way a cough or cold medication could affect the PSA level would be if it caused urinary retention. Urinary retention can result in a dramatic increase in the PSA levels.
Could very freqent ejaculation cause a constant high PSA level of 16ng/ml?
I do not believe so. There are probably other causes (benign enlargement of the prostate, inflammation in the prostate, prostate cancer, or combinations of the above). See other questions on the website. Ejaculation usually causes only low-level transient elevations of the PSA level.
Pro-PSA: What are the advantages of the Pro-PSA diagnostic test? If evaluations have been published, please provide citation(s). Where is the test commercially available?
Pro-PSA is a "new" marker. Preliminary studies indicate that it may be a better marker than free or complexed PSA, but a Pro-PSA test is not available at this time. The test and its results are still in the research stage. Some papers are published on clinical studies using Pro-PSA, and they can be found on the internet in PubMed, a service of the National Library of Medicine, www.pubmed.com. The Fall 2003 issue of Quest had an article on Pro-PSA, “Pro-PSA: Possibly a Better Marker for Prostate Cancer.”
RISK OF DEVELOPING PROSTATE CANCER? I am 59 years old with PSA of 5.1, a free PSA of 18 percent, a prostate volume of 78, and a negative twelve core biopsy done 6 months ago. Statistically, what is my risk of developing cancer that should be treated?
It is possible that a 12-core biopsy could have missed a prostate cancer, so you cannot be 100% certain that there is no prostate cancer. You should continue to be followed with PSA testing and digital rectal examination and consider repeating the biopsy if either test becomes more abnormal. There might be as high as a 15% to 20% chance that you could be diagnosed with prostate cancer in the relatively near future, in my opinion.
GLEASON GRADE 2+2: Should I have a second pathology report to verify prostate cancer is actually present with these very low numbers?
Yes. In recent years, it is very uncommon for pathologists to score prostate cancer in the low end of the Gleason scoring range (less than Gleason sums of 5). It is always a good idea to have slides reviewed, and especially so in this case.
ELDERLY MAN WITH VERY HIGH PSA: My dad is 89 and his PSA level has increased to 96. Does this mean he has terminal cancer? He does not want a biopsy as the urologist says they can do nothing for him. He has no pain.
In my opinion, he almost certainly has advanced prostate cancer. If it does cause symptoms, it is very likely that he could be successfully treated with hormonal therapy. If he does not wish to have a biopsy, he should be monitored closely by an experienced urologist who would be prepared to intervene appropriately.
PSA ANXIETY: I am a 56 year old man with a persistently rising PSA that sometimes comes down with antibiotic therapy. I have had multiple biopsies that have shown atypical cells and PIN but no cancer. Needless to say I am still worried. Is there anything else that I can do?
In my opinion, nothing but to continue to watch the PSA carefully and to be willing to have more biopsies if the PSA rises further. Biopsies in the anterior and the central regions of the prostate are especially important in cases such as yours.
WHAT ORGANS PRODUCE MALE HORMONES? I was told that the PSA readings could be affected by testosterone production in the testicles and another organ? What is the name of that organ.
The adrenal glands normally produce male hormones in relatively small quantities that can affect PSA levels. In fact, some treatments for advanced prostate cancer, such as keotconazole probably lower PSA levels by eliminating the production of male hormones by the adrenal glands.
CANCER OR PROSTATITIS? I am 43 yrs old and recently had a PSA concentration of 4.9. My doctor said the digital examination suggested that the prostrate felt slightly enlarged but smooth. He has put me on a course of antibiotics. Is my condition more likely to be cancer or some form of prostatis?
I is more likely to be prostatitis because of your young age, but it could be cancer - especially if you have a family history of early age at onset prostate cancer. If the PSA does not decrease below 2.5 with the antibiotics, I would recommend that you have a biopsy.
PSA REPEATEDLY IN CONCERNED ZONE: What should a man do if he has had repeated negative biopsies but his PSA test is in the concerned zone? I have had six biopsy procedures, initiated with PSA's from 8-19, and all have been negative.
Many men have a high PSA because of benign enlargement and/or inflammation and do not have cancer. The odds are that you are one of these men. It is important to stay under the care of a urologist and make sure you go in for scheduled tests and check-ups. These may include repeated biopsy sessions, especially if the PSA continues to rise, as biopsies are only small samples of the prostate gland, and it is not infrequent that initial biopsies miss the cancer.
TESTOSTERONE THERAPY AND PSA: Could taking a testosterone enhancing product give you an elevated PSA reading?
It could if your testosterone level was low to start with (as it presumably was) and therefore was masking your true PSA level. If the PSA is high, you should consider a prostate biopsy
I am a 37 year old man who was treated over a year ago for testaliga. I recently had my yearly physical exam and my PSA was 3.9 and the DRE results showed a slightly enlarged prostate which, according to my doctor, was prostatitis. I was told to see my urologist and be given a bladder ultrasound and DRE. I was put on medication for a month and retested after a month and my PSA dropped to 2.9. My urologist told me that this was good news and that I should return in one year to be re-examined. Should I be worried that a biopsy was not done at this time?
In my opinion, a PSA of 2.9 is too high. I would continue to monitor the PSA quarterly, and, if it does not continue to decrease, would recommend a biopsy.
My urologist did not recommend a biopsy after my original PSA test results were 3.9. He first recommended medication therapy and after a month I was retested and my PSA had dropped to 2.9. I see in your Q&A section that you routinely recommend biopsy to those who have PSA of 2.5 or higher. I am a 37 year old man who is worried about what I should do? Right now I know my latest reading was 2.9 . Why would my urologist go this route and you suggest something entirely different? Should I wait a year as my urologist suggested and have my PSA, DRE test done again at that time or should I seek a second opinion?
At age 37, the most likely cause of your PSA elevation is prostatitis. It is further supported by the fact that your PSA level came down. However, at age 37, a PSA of 2.9 is high, and I would monitor the PSA more frequently - say every three months for a while. If it does not go down to below 1, I would suggest that you consider a biopsy.
Does alcohol affect the PSA score?
DOES GOUT OR ITS TREATMENT AFFECT PSA LEVELS? In 1999, my PSA jumped from 3.1 to 6.6. Antibiotics reduced my reading to 4.5. It has fluctuated between 4.5 and 5.5 in the last four years, until this week, when it jumped to 16. I have an enlarged prostate, which results in some urine retention. I have gout and take medicine for it to reduce my uric acid. The day before the PSA test I had such a bout. Could that have affected these results?
Not to my knowledge. Neither gout or the medications used to treat it affect PSA levels. The most common cause of a fluctuating PSA level is inflammation in the prostate gland, but it is possible also to have benign enlargement and cancer. I would advise another course of antibiotics, and if the PSA does not return to baseline, I would advise a prostate biopsy.
FLUCTUATING PSA RESULTS: What would make a man's PSA go from 4.8 to 9.l then back to 5.4 and back to up to l0.9. His digital rectal exam was normal.
Inflammation in the prostate, also called prostatitis. However, remember that a PSA of 4.8 and 5.4 is high and it is possible to have both prostatitis and prostate cancer. If the PSA does not decrease to below 2.5, I would recommend that you have a prostate biopsy. Please see other Q&As on my website referring to fluctuating PSA levels.
I am really confused. I’m 59 years old and in excellent health. My PSA rose 3.4 to 5.9 in two years. Free psa 8.0%. DRE (2) Normal. 10 sample biopsy normal. My urologist said to come back in 6 months. I have increased frequency of urination and decreased flow which have gradually worsened beginning around age 47. Not severe but annoying. What's your opinion?
I would recommend asking your urologist to culture your urine and try a 4 to 6 week course of antibiotics, such as Cipro 500 mg twice a day, to see if that has a beneficial effect on your symptoms and PSA level. Your urologist might want to check your urine for abnormal cells with a cytology test and might want to perform cystoscopy to ensure that everything looks alright on the inside. It might be necessary to repeat the biopsy procedure in the future.
Are we sure that high PSA is an indication of prostate cancer? Could some substances, food or other trigger the PSA level?
A high PSA does not always mean cancer. It can be caused by an enlarged prostate gland, inflammation in the prostate gland, or other benign conditions. However, the higher the PSA, the greater the likelihood that prostate cancer is present.
TESTOSTERONE AND PSA LEVELS: Can taking testosterone raise a mans PSA levels? And if so why? If a man is taking it to bring his hormone levels back to normal or close to normal, why would it?
It can raise PSA levels if the PSA levels were suppressed because of the low testosterone level, which often is the case when the testosterone level is low enough to warrant treatment. However, if the testosterone levels are not abnormally low, giving additional testosterone might not increase the PSA levels.
Pro-PSA: What are the proPSA guidelines for recommending biopsies for men with PSAscores of 2.0-4.0?
Pro-PSA is not yet available for clinical use. No guidelines have been established at this time.
My father just died from aggressive prostate cancer. He was 59. I am 33. When should I get checked?
You could start at once and get a baseline PSA and digital rectal examination, and, in my opinion, it would not hurt to repeat it annually. In any case, I would not recommend waiting until after age 40.
YOUNG AND CAP FAMILY HISTORY: How often should a 45 year old male get a PSA with a family history of prostate cancer?
At least annually, and, in my opinion, every 6 months would not be too often. A 45 year old’s PSA should be less than 1.0 ng/ml at age 45. If it is higher, I would advise a course of antibiotics and if the PSA did not decrease to lower than 1, I would advise considering a biopsy.
What is your advice for a 45 year old white male with PSA of 1.56 Two brothers have prostate cancer and my father died from prostate cancer. What do you recommend for further evaluation and follow up?
The median PSA value for men in their 40s is about 0.6 ng/ml. If the PSA is higher, there is a higher risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer. I would advise you to try a course of antibiotics and if the PSA did not decrease to lower than 1, I would advise you to consider having a biopsy. If you do not have a biopsy, you should follow your PSA very closely.
I am a 52 year old white male. I have prostate cancer history in the family: my father and two older brothers – one aged 54 years and the second 53 years at their time of diagnosis. My PSA is now 1.97. At 51, it was 2.8; at 50 it was 1.8; at 49 it was 2.0. I am now taking 200 mcg of selenium and having my PSA measured at 6 month intervals. Am I doing enough?
Your PSA is a little bit higher than that of the usual 52 year-old man (median PSA 0.6-0.9). With your family history, I would advise you to continue to follow it carefully and if it trends upward at all, I would recommend that you consider having a biopsy.
RISING PSA IN THE LOW RANGE: I'm 53 years old. In the past three years of annual testing, my PSA went from: 1.83 to 2.04 to 2.78. Is this rising too fast?
In my opinion, yes. I would advise you to have a biopsy.
DECREASING FREE PSA: Would a declining prostate volume result in one's free PSA value to decline also - even if there was no prostate cancer? My thinking is that whatever was earlier shown as bound in larger prostate gland would continue to be there, but inside a much smaller environment - thus possibly causing one's free PSA reading to decline. Does this make sense or just what is the situation?
It could. We now know that "free" PSA is made up of several components: BPSA and IPSA that are increased with benign prostatic enlargement (BPH) and proPSA that is increased with cancer. So, if the prostate shrinks because of treatment of BPH, the free PSA level could decrease.
AVODART'S EFFECT ON PSA: Taking Avodart three months PSA 4.5 What is the true reading?
It is hard to say, but certainly higher, and high enough to recommend a biopsy.
PSA VELOCITY AND WATCHFUL WAITING: I read your article on PSA velocity and morbidity in the July 8 NEJM and wondered if it might mean that watchful waiting might be a plausible option for me, particularly considering the lifestyle impacts of both RP and radiation? In April 2004, I had a positive biopsy (left lobe: 30% of one biopsy core, moderately differentiated, Gleason 6 (3+3); right lobe: 5% of one biopsy core, focal moderately differentiated, Gleason 6 (3+3)--perineural invasion not detected). My PSA scores have been: March 01: 3.5 Sept. 02: 3.9Mar. 03: 3.5Oct. 03: 4.2Feb. 04: 4.2 (free ratio 8.1%)May 04: 8.6July 04: 4.7I am a 54 year old man, otherwise in seemingly good health.
Although your tumor features and PSA velocity are favorable, I would not recommend watchful waiting because of your young age. Your prostate cancer will have a long time to progress, if you are otherwise healthy, and the earlier you have it treated, the better, in my opinion.
WHAT IS A HIGH PSA? What is considered high from a PSA report or what is the range of PSA readings in the blood stream?
The range is from 0 to thousands. In men with a perfectly healthy prostate gland (i.e., no benign enlargement, no inflammation, no cancer) the PSA should be less than 1. Any of these conditions can raise the PSA level. However, there is a direct association between the PSA level and the risk of cancer. It is about 10% to 15% if the PSA is less than 2.5; about 25% if the PSA is 2.6 to 4; about 35% to 40% if the PSA is 4-10; and more than 50% if the PSA is higher than 10. See the Quest article of August 2004 for more recent information on other PSA measures such as PSA velocity, PSA density, Pprcent free or complexed PSA, etc.
I've read your Q&As regarding infection in the prostate and its effect on PSA, but can infections other places in the body affect the PSA. Specifically, I'd like to know about periodontal or gum infection and its possible effect on PSA.
They have no effect on the PSA level. Only urinary tract and prostate infections affect the PSA.
My PSA has been steady for about two years at 7.5. But my free PSA is at 6%, having started at 14%. Biopsies two years ago found 10 suspicious cells. Our urologist suggested more tests in a few months. Should we be worried.
If the suspicious cells were high-grade PIN (prostatic intraepithelia neoplasia) or ASAP (atypical small acinar proliferation), and the percent free PSA is decreasing to 6%, I would be concerned.
However, it is reassuring that his total PSA has not increased for the past two years. Perhaps, the safest course would be to repeat the biopsy procedure. If you do not wish to do this, I would recommend that the PSA levels be measured every 3 to 6 months.
Can medicines for cholesterol and for heart problems cause a rise in PSA? Also, can these medications cause a rise in PSA after a radical prostatectomy, and would they have any adverse interactions with hormonal therapy treatments?
No. In fact, emerging evidence suggests that medications for cholesterol (statins) might lower the risk for prostate cancer and might decrease the aggressiveness of prostate cancer.
Is there any connection between using Viagra and PSA values?
No, there isn’t.
Should a family history of prostate cancer affect the total PSA or PSA Velocity threshold for biopsy?
Men with a family history of prostate cancer are often biopsied at a younger age– due to an elevated PSA – than men without a family history of prostate cancer.
Men with a family history of prostate cancer are diagnosed with prostate cancer at a younger age than men without a family history of prostate cancer.
A family history of prostate cancer appears to be associated with a higher rate of cancer diagnosis among men with a total PSA level from 2.5 to 4.0 ng/ml or a PSA Velocity of more than 0.75 mg/ml in a year.
Although family history of prostate cancer is associated with an increased risk of cancer diagnosis, it is not associated with more aggressive tumor features.
(taken from a URF sponsored study presented at the May, 2008 AUA meeting)
I am 53 years old and taking Flomax. My PSA test was 14.9 and three weeks later, it was 12.0. My DRE was clean. My primary physician told me that a high PSA doesn’t necessarily indicate prostate cancer? Why would he say that? And is there any truth to it?
There is truth to the fact that not everyone with a high PSA value has prostate cancer, especially if the PSA decreases spontaneously or in response to antibiotic treatment.
However, the median PSA value for men in their 50s is less than 1 (0.9), and the higher the PSA is above that value, the more likely they have prostate cancer.
If your PSA does not decrease dramatically, I would recommend a biopsy.
Return to Additional Questions